• Users Online: 65
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home Current issue Ahead of print Search About us Editorial board Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 5  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 8-13

Angle's classification versus dental esthetic index in evaluation of malocclusion among 12–15-year-old school children in Thiruchengode, Tamil Nadu


Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Vivekanandha Dental College for Women, Tiruchengode, Tamil Nadu, India

Correspondence Address:
Maivizhi Rajasekaran
Vivekanandha Dental College for Women, Tiruchengode, Tamil Nadu
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jiadsr.jiadsr_2_18

Rights and Permissions

Objective: To evaluate Angle's classification and Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) among 12-15 year old school children and find the association between them. Methods: Sample consists of 400, 12-15 year old school children. Malocclusion prevalence, the severity of malocclusion and treatment requisite were evaluated to find the association between Angle's and DAI. Pearson Chi-square test was used for the comparison of categorical data. (P<0.05 was considered significant). Results: The percentage of children with DAI< 25 indicating little or no need for treatment was 65.5% and 12.8% had highly desirable or mandatory need fot treatment ie DAI>31. Among children with DAI< 25, a significantly high percentage of patients were in Class I (83.2%) whereas among children with DAI>31, higher percentage was noted in Class II/div 1 (29.2%) and Class III (28.6) than in Class 1(5.7) (P&?#60;0.001). Only 28.6% of children with Class III malocclusion were associated with appropriate DAI scores (>31) of severity and treatment need category. Conclusion: Only 12.75% of children had DAI score of > 31 suggesting highly desirable or mandatory orthodontic treatment requisite. DAI was not sensitive in terms of severity and treatment requisite criteria. Complimentary use of two methods seems to be feasible in all inclusive evaluation and care.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed554    
    Printed77    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded92    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal